Project Details...
THE HEYGATE ------------------- The Heygate Estate in the Elephant and Castle in South London was completed in 1973, and was an example of modernist 'utopian' architecture. It joined the nearby Aylesbury estate as one of the largest housing blocks in the city. The Heygate was built during a time when many planners and architects strongly believed that their building designs could improve people's lives. Many city council architects were followers of the ideology of architectural and environmental determinism: a belief that if the environment was changed in ways prescribed by utopian design, human behaviour would improve and happiness increase. The fact that the estate was less than 40 years old when it was tabled for demolition, suggests that the ideology and the design were flawed in some way. Nevertheless, not all elements of the estate's architecture were accused of fostering poor quality of living. Many can still be regarded as good design practice. From my experience, when I walked through the estate I often had contradictory feelings From my experience, when I walked through the estate I often had contradictory feelings. The high-rise buildings that marked out the edges of the site, felt oppressive, impersonal and intimidating. While the smaller maisonettes in the central areas, surrounded by mature trees, more personal space, balconies, and communal grass areas, generally felt more secure and safe place to live. In the images that follow, I have photographed areas of the estate, which I feel exhibit these contradictions. I have included a variety of quotes alongside some of the images. I do not necessarily agree with all of them, but I have used them to highlight the sterile way in which housing is often planned, discussed and reviewed. I started photographing the Heygate in 2007 and continued working there intermittently until 2011. The estate has now been emptied and demolition is finally underway. The regeneration of the Heygate and the surrounding area has been controversial and problematic. Like many similar schemes in London, opponents argue that many of the original residents will not be re-homed locally, and that the area will become unaffordable to those who once lived there.