Project Details...
ELECTROSENSITIVE: Outliers in a Wireless World -------------------------------------------------------------- This series focuses on a controversial condition called Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS)*. Sufferers claim that electromagnetic fields (EMF’s) from mobiles, wi-fi and other common devices make them ill. They report a multitude of symptoms such as headaches, rashes, memory impairment, heart palpitations, sleep disorders, fatigue and nausea. Once the condition is identified, sufferers often make radical changes to their lives; like moving to a remote part of the country, leaving or changing their job, staying away from wi-fi and mobile phone signals, and insulating their home from EMF’s. Their actions are often met with disbelief. They’re labelled as technophobes who use pseudoscience to fight their cause, and told their symptoms are psychosomatic. As a result, sufferers can feel isolated and many choose not to talk openly about the condition. A search online will yield a plethora of websites dedicated to spreading information about the dangers of mobiles, wi-fi and electromagnetic fields. There are accusations of cover-ups, links to cancer, industry sponsored research and government oversight and/or complicity. Distinguished scientists, academics, sufferers and support groups present contradictory arguments, differing nomenclatures, diagnostic criteria, aetiologic hypotheses and treatments. The internet has become the primary battleground for information supremacy. Although the web provides a platform for information exchange, debate and peer support, it can spread misinformation and reinforce confirmation bias. When research is released stating that EHS is either real or psychosomatic, a range of counter studies are put forward. Discerning fact from opinion becomes increasingly difficult, and even the official messages are confusing. The Council of Europe, the European Environment Agency, and other reputable bodies are calling for governments to use the precautionary principle – given the mistakes we have made with tobacco and asbestos – and are urging that the scientific basis for the standards on exposure are reconsidered. Yet Public Health England concludes that the research suggests that the technology is safe, and psychologists argue that multiple studies into EHS have failed to provide any evidence that it is anything more than psychological. Nevertheless, both sides are generally agreed that whatever the cause, their symptoms are real and that EHS sufferers experience significant social and personal challenges. I started work on "Electrosensitive" in early 2012 and spent a year traveling the UK to photograph and video interview sufferers and experts. My intention has not been to judge or authenticate the arguments from either side. However, I felt compelled to share the experiences of sufferers who feel misunderstood and ignored, and to highlight the apparent inconsistencies within the scientific research. Those I have interviewed showed courage in speaking openly about their condition. Despite facing ridicule, they passionately believe that wider public awareness is vital. Although their concerns and arguments run counter to prevailing opinion and perception, this does not mean their stories should not be heard. My large format portraits are accompanied by landscapes and still-life images of devices and materials that sufferers use to shield themselves from EMF’s. The series was published in The Guardian Weekend Magazine in March 2013. You can view my short film which accompanies the series on the 'video' section of my website. You can also read more about the series in an article I was commissioned to write by Photoworks here http://photoworks.org.uk/outliers-in-a-wireless-world *Note: EHS is referred to by a variety of other nomenclatures. "Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance Attributed to Electromagnetic Fields" (IEI-EMF) is commonly used by medical professionals who argue that the condition is wholly psyschosomatic.